> > We won't know until after Oracle releases Solaris 11 whether or not
> > they'll live up to their promise to open the source to ZFSv31. ÂUntil
> > Solaris 11 is released, there's really not much point in debating it.
> being available to a wide community to review and amend, as in terms
> of Oracle not really getting the point about open source development.
That's how I feel - it will just be sad if they don't. There's no point
arguing or bickering or guessing. They either will, or they won't, do the
right thing. All we can do is hope. It would be a real shame if Oracle
didn't simply open source the code. It's not as if there are any trade secrets
left - the technology is well known. After all, Sun published the guts and
they can't put the genie back in the lamp. So the principles of ZFS can be
duplicated. But it sure would be nice if they spared everyone a lot of effort
and annoyance and just GPL'd ZFS. I think the goodwill generated would
definitely offset any minor losses. I know that, as a person who's been a
Solaris admin for almost 20 years and not generally a big fan of Oracle, it
would certainly go a long way towards starting our new, enforced relationship
off on a better foot.
I have to say that given Oracle's track record I don't expect it. I fully
expect them to lock it up as tight and proprietary as possible and charge
everyone as much as they can, because what's important is The Last Penny On
Earth. But I'm hoping I'm wrong and being overly pessimistic.
Learn more about Merchant Link at www.merchantlink.com.
THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL. This e-mail message and any attachments are
proprietary and confidential information intended only for the use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not
print, distribute, or copy this message or any attachments. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail
and delete this message and any attachments from your computer.
zfs-discuss mailing list