| Subject: | Re: [zfs-discuss] SSD partitioned into multiple L2ARC read cache |
|---|---|
| From: | Gil Vidals |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:31:31 -0700 |
|
Based on the answers I received, I will stick to an SSD device fully dedicated to each pool. This means I will have four SSDs and four pools. This seems acceptable to me as it keeps things simpler and if one SSD (L2ARC) fails, the others are still working correctly. Thank you. Gil Vidals On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Eff Norwood <smith@xxxxxxxx> wrote: We tried this in our environment and found that it didn't work out. The more partitions we used, the slower it went. We decided just to use the entire SSD as a read cache and it worked fine. Still has the TRIM issue of course until the next version. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] What is the "1000 bit"?, Tomas Ögren |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] SSD partitioned into multiple L2ARC read cache, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] SSD partitioned into multiple L2ARC read cache, Eff Norwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] SSD partitioned into multiple L2ARC read cache, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |