|
|
On 21-Aug-10, at 3:06 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Bill Sommerfeld <bill.sommerfeld@xxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
On 08/21/10 10:14, Ross Walker wrote:
...
Would I be better off forgoing resiliency for simplicity, putting
all my faith into the Equallogic to handle data resiliency?
IMHO, no; the resulting system will be significantly more brittle.
Exactly how brittle I guess depends on the Equallogic system.
If you don't let zfs manage redundancy, Bill is correct: it's a more
fragile system that *cannot* self heal data errors in the (deep)
stack. Quantifying the increased risk, is a question that Richard
Elling could probably answer :)
--Toby
-Ross
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
|
|