| Subject: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Pool import with failed ZIL device now possible ? |
|---|---|
| From: | Jeff Bonwick |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:54:11 -0800 |
> People used fastfs for years in specific environments (hopefully > understanding the risks), and disabling the ZIL is safer than fastfs. > Seems like it would be a useful ZFS dataset parameter. We agree. There's an open RFE for this: 6280630 zil synchronicity No promise on date, but it will bubble to the top eventually. Jeff _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs send/receive : panic and reboot, Lori Alt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Pool import with failed ZIL device now possible ?, Christo Kutrovsky |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Pool import with failed ZIL device now possible ?, Andrew Gabriel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Pool import with failed ZIL device now possible ?, Kjetil Torgrim Homme |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |