Re: [zfs-discuss] pkg image-update to snv 121 -> shouldn't ZFS version b
Re: [zfs-discuss] pkg image-update to snv 121 -> shouldn't ZFS version be upgraded on /rpool
Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:44:12 +0200
>When I check
># pfexec zpool status rpool
> pool: rpool
> state: ONLINE
>status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can
> still be used, but some features are unavailable.
>action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
> pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions.
> scrub: none requested
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> rpool ONLINE 0 0 0
> c8t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>errors: No known data errors
>Shouldn't the image-update take care of that ?
>And is it safe to do an upgrade ?
No, that would make your other BEs unbootable.
This should really be "automatic"; there needs to be a way where some
utility can determine what the minimal ZFS version is.
zfs-discuss mailing list