| Subject: | [zfs-discuss] pkg image-update to snv 121 -> shouldn't ZFS version be upgraded on /rpool |
|---|---|
| From: | Per Ãberg |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:39:31 PDT |
When I check
--
# pfexec zpool status rpool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can
still be used, but some features are unavailable.
action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions.
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
--
Shouldn't the image-update take care of that ?
And is it safe to do an upgrade ?
/Per
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] ub_guid_sum and vdev guids, P. Anil Kumar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] pkg image-update to snv 121 -> shouldn't ZFS version be upgraded on /rpool, Casper . Dik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] ub_guid_sum and vdev guids, P. Anil Kumar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] pkg image-update to snv 121 -> shouldn't ZFS version be upgraded on /rpool, Casper . Dik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |