>So is 5 with 1 hotswap (total 6) a sensible arrangement? And would
>that leave me with something like 2tb (minus manufacturer exaggeration)
>and one disk would be swallowed for parity data.
Yeah, yeah. Perhaps you can ask the "SI" to change the definition of
"T" from 10^12 to 2^40. The only people who are weird are those computer
people who believe that 1K == 1024 and 1M is 2^20, etc. I suggested that
we just give it a rest. (Even Flash memory is now "SI" measured)
zfs-discuss mailing list