|
|
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Darren J Moffat <darrenm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> The closest equivalent to ufsdump and ufsrestore is "star".
>> I very strongly disagree. The closest ZFS equivalent to ufsdump is 'zfs
>> send'. 'zfs send' like ufsdump has initmiate awareness of the the
>> actual on disk layout and is an integrated part of the filesystem
>> implementation.
>
> I strongly disagree. Like ufsdump, star creates archives that allow a file
> based access. This does not work with zfs send.
>
But star doesn't support Solaris Extended attributes and ZFS ACLs. This
means you *may* loose critical data if you use star. Whereas zfs send
preserves everything.
-Mark
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
|
|