|
|
Depends on what your end goal is really. The opensolaris.com version is releasing every 6 months, and I don't believe there's currently any patching between releases. If you feel comfortable sitting on it that long, with potential bugs for 6 months, great. If not... it should be an easy choice. Personally I chose option 3 and loaded nexenta. You get regular updates, but it still *stable* (or has been for me to date).
--Tim
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Christopher Gibbs < chris.gibbs@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Pretty much what the subject says. I'm wondering which platform will
have the best stability/performance for a ZFS file server.
I've been using Solaris Express builds of Nevada for quite a while and
I'm currently on build 79b but I'm at a point where I want to upgrade.
So now I have to ask, should I go with the OpenSolaris (.com) release
instead? Also, is there one that has better/newer driver support?
(Mostly in relation to SATA controllers)
Not sure if this is the right place to post this but since my main
goal is a ZFS server then I should get your guys opinions.
--
Christopher Gibbs
Programmer / Analyst
Web Integration & Programming
Abilene Christian University
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
|
|