| Subject: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Sanity check -- x4500 storage server for enterprise file service |
|---|---|
| From: | Dave |
| Date: | Thu, 08 May 2008 11:08:36 -0600 |
On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote: > It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots need to be > stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to consider if you're planning > frequent snapshots. I've never heard this before. Why would snapshots need to be stopped for a disk failure? -- Dave _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Sanity check -- x4500 storage server for enterprise file service, Bob Friesenhahn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Sanity check -- x4500 storage server for enterprise file service, Luke Scharf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Sanity check -- x4500 storage server for enterprise file service, Richard Elling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Sanity check -- x4500 storage server for enterprise file service, Luke Scharf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |