| Subject: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Single SAN Lun presented to 4 Hosts |
|---|---|
| From: | Joerg Schilling |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:50:02 +0200 |
Casper.Dik@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >AFAIK, a read-only UFS mount will unroll the log and thus write to th=
> >e medium.
>
>
> It does not (that's what code inspection suggests).
>
> It will update the in-memory image with the log entries but the
> log will not be rolled.
Why then does fsck mount the fs read-only before starting the fsck task?
I thought this was in order to unroll the log first.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (uni)
schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Single SAN Lun presented to 4 Hosts, Casper . Dik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS needs a viable backup mechanism, Joerg Schilling |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Single SAN Lun presented to 4 Hosts, Casper . Dik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [zfs-discuss] Single SAN Lun presented to 4 Hosts, Charles DeBardeleben |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |