Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 7:08:07 PM, you wrote:
AL> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:34:13PM +0200, Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
>> - RAID-Z is _very_ slow when one disk is broken.
AL> Do you have data on this? The reconstruction should be relatively cheap
AL> especially when compared with the initial disk access.
If I stop all activity to x4500 with a pool made of several raidz2 and
then I issue spare attach I get really poor performance (1-2MB/s) on a
pool with lot of relatively small files.
zfs-discuss mailing list