[ I've seen the response where one astute list participate noticed you're
running a 2-way raidz device, when the documentation clearly states that
the mimimum raidz volume consists of 3 devices ]
Not very astute. The documentation clearly states that the minimum is
A raidz group with N disks of size X can hold approxi-
mately (N-1)*Xbytes and can withstand one device failing
before data integrity is compromised. The minimum number
of devices in a raidz group is 2. The recommended number
is between 3 and 9.
If the minimum were actually 3, this configuration wouldn't work at all.
zfs-discuss mailing list