| Subject: | [zebra 22492] BGP Full route table or just default? |
|---|---|
| From: | Joseph Kotran |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Jul 2005 10:52:38 -0400 |
Hello,
I am in the process of turning up BGP with my ISP's. One ISP suggested
that
they simply provide me a default route. The other suggests that they give me
the full route table. Please help me understand what is better. My hardware
can handle the full table. My goals for BGP are to load balance outgoing
traffic and provide redundancy for incoming.
Regards,
_______________________________________________________________________
Joseph Kotran Lead Systems Administrator
Lockheed Martin
Advanced Technology Laboratories
3 Executive Campus 6th Floor
Cherry Hill NJ USA 08002 Web: http://www.atl.lmco.com
_______________________________________________
Zebra mailing list
Zebra@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://ml.zebra.org/mailman/listinfo/zebra
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [zebra 22491] neighbor peer version 4+; Multiprotocol Extensions in Zebra and MP_REACH_NLRI implementation, alexand2 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [zebra 22493] Re: BGP Full route table or just default?, Arnold Nipper |
| Previous by Thread: | [zebra 22491] neighbor peer version 4+; Multiprotocol Extensions in Zebra and MP_REACH_NLRI implementation, alexand2 |
| Next by Thread: | [zebra 22493] Re: BGP Full route table or just default?, Arnold Nipper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |