|
|
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:14:03AM +0200, Andreas John wrote:
>Whoops? This is a misunderstanding: passive interface IS available in
Yeah, I found that out through testing partway through the message and
re-read to see where I said it wasn't available, but didn't catch that
part. That should work just fine, even if I had to set up another
network that just links the two routers and passive the whole internal
interface
Thanks,
Sean
--
Self-destructive people sometimes miss. -- shapr from #python
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo@xxxxxxxxx>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability
Back off man. I'm a scientist. http:// Society.org/
_______________________________________________
Zebra mailing list
Zebra@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://ml.zebra.org/mailman/listinfo/zebra
|
|