warineur@mailman.halisp.net
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WarInEur] Additional Units-- WHAT ARE THEY? DG games question

Subject: Re: [WarInEur] Additional Units-- WHAT ARE THEY? DG games question
From: srm
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:00:56 -0700 PDT
I recall a lengthy series of CWIE list surveys moderated by the late Hank Meyer 
about 8-9  years ago (before some of the more enthusiastic posters on this list 
were members) wherein we were asked what unit mix  we'd like to include in the 
DG BWIE game.
 
Further, we understood this would considered for the future computer game (i.e. 
" CWIE2". I don't have the current game, so could someone print a LIST of the 
type of units already in the new game?

I'd like to see who got what "goodies", as I've read often about the many 
German 7-10s (and old idea of Karl Gaarsoe's) and other "new" stuff but I want 
to see the whole (pro Axis?) list before I weigh in.

Thanks

S.


--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Karl Gaarsoe <oscardalibrarian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Karl Gaarsoe <oscardalibrarian@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [WarInEur] Additional Units
> To: john_pace_ca@xxxxxxxxx, warineur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 9:22 AM
> Yes,
> but why bother?  This just turns the game into
> pseudo-Europa.
> 
> I can see the (Personnel Points) case for the Lublin (?)
> Poles, but that is about it.
> 
> Karl Gaarsoe
> 
> --- On Sun, 3/29/09, John Pace
> <john_pace_ca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: John Pace
> <john_pace_ca@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [WarInEur] Additional Units
> To: WarinEur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Kent & Sue
> Haunschild" <kentsue@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 9:13 AM
> 
> One think I would
> like to see is the expatrate units, the poles, etc. for the
> allies.  The poles, romanian TD division, on the sovet
> side.  And the various pro-axis allies like RONA
> Vasilov's army, and a host of pro-axis minor allies
> security units and ostbattalions.  They definately
> would help add colour to the game.
> John 
> 
> --- On Sat, 3/28/09, Kent & Sue Haunschild
> <kentsue@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Kent & Sue
> Haunschild <kentsue@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [WarInEur] Additional Units
> To: WarinEur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009, 6:35 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What Additional Units would people like
> to see in the game?
>  
> I am putting together a image bit map
> and will include additional suggestions if room. (We can
> store 500 images so that's a lot).
>  
> I have already added all the other
> optional units listed in the DG rules except the Marines and
> all the other units in Greg's version.
>  
> In addition I have added:
>  
> All cav units have a image with a 4
> movement so 1-4, 2-4, 3-4, etc.
>  
> French 4-10/1-10bg, 2-4 and 1-4
> Divisions
> CW Fast MSU (1-2) and Fast RR
> (1-6)
> Italian 3-10/1-10kg, 3-4 and 3-4 Mtn,
> 1-2 MSU
> Hungarian 3-10 and 2-10, 2-4 and 3-4
> Mtn.
> Greeks 3-4 Mtn
> Bulgarians 3-4 Mtn
> Finns 4-6, 4-6 and 4-7 Ski
> Swedes 4-5 and 4-6 Ski
> Germans 1-6RR, 1-2 MSU, 16-1-1 Art,
> 4-5VG/1-5VG, 4-4/1-4, 5-5 air landing, 6-1-10/1-1-10 Art,
> 5-10, 6-6, and 4-6, 7-5/2-5SS, 5-5/1-5SS, 8-10/2-10 SS, 2-5
> Inf Div.
> Soviets-11-7/2-7, 10-7/2-7 Mech and
> tanl Corps, 2-4/1-4 Cav div, 7-5/1-5 Cav Corps, 11-1-10,
> 12-1-10 Art Corps
>  
> What kind of other units would players
> like to see included?
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> WarInEur mailing list
> WarInEur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/warineur
> 
> 
> 
>      
> _______________________________________________
> WarInEur mailing list
> WarInEur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/warineur
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WarInEur mailing list
> WarInEur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/warineur
> 


      
_______________________________________________
WarInEur mailing list
WarInEur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/warineur

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>