|
|
Are there A records set up in your zone file data for the cluster
service hosts in question ? i.e., for the example below, there need to
be A records set up for MALVM3 and MALVM9... in some versions prior
to 5.2, these A records were 'forged'.. with the more complex attributes
(views, multiple formats, etc.) in Bind 9, this is not yet a feature.
The A records need to be manually added...
Is this working on other architectures for you but not I64?
Thanks
-Ralph Young
Process Software
Remember this one?
On Apr 10, 11:59 pm, Malcolm Dunnett <noth...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I can't get multinet cluster service names to work reliably. It worked
> just fine for years in older versions of multinet, but with multinet 5.2
> the domain nameserver doesn't seem to be able to reliably see it. It was
> working for a while today but then it quit, eg:
> MALVM9> mu nslook vmscluster.mala.bc.ca localhost
> Server: LOCALHOST
> Address: 127.0.0.1
> *** LOCALHOST can't find VMSCLUSTER.MALA.BC.CA: Non-existent host/domain
> MALVM9> mu netcon domain show
> Connected to NETCONTROL server on "LOCALHOST"
> < malvm9.mala.bc.ca Network Control V5.2(10) at Thu 10-Apr-2008 8:49PM-PDT
> < Service VMSCLUSTER.MALA.BC.CA:
> < Nodename Address Rating
> < -------- --------------- ------
> < MALVM3 142.25.103.73 169
> < MALVM9 142.25.103.71 169
> < End of line
> The nameserver does not show the translation of vmscluster even though
> the mu netcon domain show displays that the two hosts are both
> contributing entries.
> The servers are Alphaservers running VMS 8.3
> Anyone else seen this problem. Anyone successfully using Multinet
> cluster service names with Multinet 5.2?
And
> Process Software has confirmed this is a bug. They've opened a defect
> report (DE 10509).
This continues to be a problem on IA64 with NAMED-040_A052 and
UCXDRIVER-050_A052 installed - any suggestions? Should this still be
failing?
|
|