uk.comp.os.linux
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The 1n command

Subject: Re: The 1n command
From: "Chris F.A. Johnson"
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 00:01:59 -0400
Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux

On 2007-11-02, Ian Rawlings wrote:
>
>
> On 2007-11-02, Geoffrey Clements <bitbucket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Please explain Ian, my understanding of "built-in" as far as commands go
>> seems to align with nix's so I'm intrigued as to what you mean.
>
> Most linux systems have multiple shells, and each one has a different
> number of "built in" commands, e.g. alias in the case of bash.

    All POSIX shells have alias built in.

> "ln" is not one of them in any of the shells I've used, it's a
> stand-alone binary and so is certainly not built in to the shell.

    Hmmmm....

$ type ln
ln is a shell builtin

    It is one of the example dynamically loadable builtins that are
    packaged with the bash source code.

-- 
   Chris F.A. Johnson, webmaster         <http://Woodbine-Gerrard.com>
   ===================================================================
   Author:
   Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>