|Subject:||Re: The 1n command|
|Date:||Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:03:19 GMT|
Ian Rawlings wrote:
On 2007-11-03, Paul Martin <[email protected]> wrote:This is correct, but not "correct".[email protected] ~ $ which ln /usr/bin/ln [email protected] ~ $ ls -l /usr/bin/ln lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jan 26 2006 /usr/bin/ln -> /bin/ln [email protected] ~ $ ls -l /bin/ln -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24004 Jan 26 2006 /bin/ln [email protected] ~ $ ldd /bin/ln linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e3c000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f60000)[email protected] ~ $ echo $BASH_VERSION 3.00.16(1)-releaseSo it's built into your version of bash, but not mine. But who was claiming what was built in, and built into what? Largely irrelevant otherwise without context.
"Built in" usually refers to shell built ins... commands that for reasons of efficiency or access to environment are part of the program that implements the shell as opposed to separate standalone binaries.
echo and set are two that spring to mind but there are many others... VH.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: The 1n command, Ian Rawlings|
|Next by Date:||computer rental, kanghuaiqiang|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: The 1n command, Ian Rawlings|
|Next by Thread:||Mondoarchive, Andy Cap|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|