uk.comp.misc
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Are SATA drives less resilient to file-system corruption than IDE?

Subject: Re: Are SATA drives less resilient to file-system corruption than IDE?
From: "Mortimer" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:44:54 +0100
Newsgroups: uk.comp.misc

"Jim" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:p07n74holdltq8cue64sg2lacmge5ena4h@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:21:00 +0100, "Mortimer" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Over the past couple of months I've been called to three customers whose 
>>PCs
>>have failed to boot. When I put the HDD in a second computer, Windows 
>>CHDSKs
>>it, corrects a few filesystem errors and leaves the disk in a state where 
>>it
>>will boot the original PC perfectly.
>>
>>In all three cases, the PCs have had SATA drives. I've never seen this
>>symptom with IDE disks. Is there something about SATA drives which makes
>>them more vulnerable to filesystem corruption than IDE ones, assuming the
>>same filesystem (NTFS) and OS (XP) in both cases?
>
>  You may find that if you change the offending drive to another
> SATA slot it may clear this problem, the failing to boot part if
> not the filesystem corruption.  It worked for me.

I'll try that if I encounter another PC that displays this symptom: it's 
quicker to change the SATA lead to another socket on the customer's PC that 
to bring the PC back to base to connect the disk into a different PC. I 
suppose the latter is an extreme case of what you are recommending - the 
disk in connected to a different SATA connector *on a different PC* ;-)

Assuming that the PC will boot, there is every chance the Windows will check 
and repair any filesystem corruption if it deems this to be necessary. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>