uk.comp.homebuilt
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Youtube playback

Subject: Re: Youtube playback
From: "Roger"
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:49:53 -0000
Newsgroups: uk.comp.homebuilt


"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:hcuv8d$f75$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> news:hcuub9$djh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
>> news:hcusio$ai1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Really... that is interesting... I am using Windows 7 Internet Explorer 
>>> 8, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 1.3GHZ ULV CPU, 3GB RAM maybe I should try 
>>> Safari or Google Chrome to see if that makes a difference.
>>
>> I installed Google Chrome and got the flash player for it from Adobe, it 
>> was still a bit jerky but perhaps a bit better. Then I went back to 
>> Internet Explorer 8 and tried again this time it was much much better, I 
>> do not know if getting the flash player in Google Chrome has updated the 
>> flash player used by IE8 as well... but when I played it just now it was 
>> smooth in the bits which were jerky before (when the guy is dancing in 
>> the train).
>
> In reflection I think it depends how it buffers it because when I tried in 
> IE8 again it was back to being a bit jerky in parts, I do not have a good 
> connection here at the moment so the buffering could be affected, it seems 
> like sometimes it skips frames in order to keep up and then when you play 
> it back you notice it. It could also be down to the server load.

I do have a good connection - it still has special effects which you see as
a fault.  Even if you save the files and play them through a PC or a
DVD player.  The original video has the effects in it.
Nothing to do with your computer, or lack of it.  No difference here between
a 3.2GHz laptop and a PC with a quad core processor and huge video card.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>