[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Vista Briefcase worse than XP?!

Subject: Re: Vista Briefcase worse than XP?!
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:16:49 +0000
Newsgroups: uk.comp.homebuilt

On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:34:34 +0000, Dave J. <[email protected]>

>In MsgID<[email protected]> on Wed, 05 Nov
>2008 08:24:23 +0000, in uk.comp.homebuilt, 'Alex Fraser' wrote:
>>> The Apples and the Linux box get 20-40meg/second to the NAS. I'm
>>> guessing it's some sort of dissent between the Linux that runs the NAS
>>> and Cygwin's sockets. 
>>I'm no expert on Cygwin's internals, but from what I do know about 
>>network programming on Unix systems and Windows, I'd expect sockets to 
>>have a fairly thin wrapper; there's no obvious reason for such dissent 
>>at that level.
>>Could it be some kind of version conflict?
>Sorry to come out with obvious (and therefore most likely already
>eliminated) ideas but don't different OSs sometimes force particular
>combinations of speed and duplex settings onto their NICs?

Not really. GigE is a lot cleverer about these things that 10 or
100mbit ethernet.

All machines in my testing are running at full-duplex gigabit. 

        Cheers - Jaimie
"What happens if a big asteroid hits Earth? Judging from realistic
simulations involving a sledgehammer and a common laboratory frog,
we can assume it will be pretty bad."                 - Dave Barry

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>