uk.adverts.computer
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OT: Recommend a wireless card

Subject: Re: OT: Recommend a wireless card
From: Palindrome
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 08:26:23 GMT
Newsgroups: uk.adverts.computer, uk.comp.homebuilt, uk.comp.home-networking


DCA wrote:
Palindrome wrote:
DCA wrote:
Palindrome wrote:
Jon wrote:
news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx declared for all the world to hear...
Overbudget to start with, and maybe he lives in a place than only has one mains socket on each wall with pile of extensions plugging into it.

Honeplugs work perfectly well over extensions. I'm using two in my house right now, one of which is in a 6-way which itself is plugged into an 8-
way surge protector.

Just an aside:

Plugging an extension cord into an extension cord is not a good idea. You can easily end up with too high an earth impedance - which greatly increases the risk of fatal shock and fire.

If you simply must do it, replace the fuse in the second extension with a 5A one and limit the load to under that. It quite possibly is well under that, already (ie <1.2kW). A fuse is only a few pence and only takes a moment to change. Compare that to how much time and cost would be involved if there was a fire...

Better, of course, is to get the ring main right, with sockets where you want them - and run a single extension from each.

Sorry to be an old maid but yes - I do know of fires that have resulted from daisy chaining extension leads..

You know - I have seen a lot of your advice and it has always been good but on this occasion I am struggling with your logic!
As you say, the ring main is the best option
BUT:
Greater risk of shock from Earth impedance increase over an extension lead or two - give me a break! Nonsense! The risk of a shock is there regardless of earth. No earth will ever prevent the risk of shock! If someone diverts the current into themselves then the earth is irrelevant! In fact, touching the live with one hand and the earth with the other is an example of when an earth can be more lethal! Just get an ELCB and this is the best thing for safety in existence. The fuse in the second lead to 5A - why? Each lead can be 13A and the combined load of any number of piggy backed leads will only be governed by the first fuse anyway. If the first lead is fused at 13A and each of the leads is rated at 13A then there is no fire risk from overloading at all (with the exception of long leads left coiled up in which case it can certainly get hot and the effective load rating is dramatically reduced).

The earth connection to exposed metalwork is there so that any breakdown in insulation will cause a very large fault current, through the live conductor, the earth conductor and the protective device, such as to cause the protective device to operate quickly enough to prevent the voltage on the exposed metalwork rising to a high enough voltage, or sustaining that voltage, for long enough to pose a lethal shock hazard.

This relies on the earth impedance being low enough to cause a very high, but very short duration, fault current.

Fault clearance is dependent on the i2t characteristic of the protective device. Too low a fault current will result in too long a fault clearance time, to be safe. A 5A fuse has a lower i2t and will thus tend to clear a particular fault current much faster than a 13A fuse.

This is nothing to do with overloading. This is all about earth impedance and how fast faults can clear, when they happen.

A typical thermal fuse characteristic is shown here:
http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Book/3.6.3.htm

Note that (for these typical fuses), a 15A fuse will take 10 seconds to blow with 40A current. If the per-wire extension lead resistance is just 3 ohms, the fault current will not exceed 40A, even with a dead-short between live wire and equipment case. The case will rise to 120v and remain at that for 10 seconds, until the fuse finally blows.

If a 5A fuse had been fitted in that extension lead, it would clear that fault in less than a tenth of a second.. The case would still rise to 120v, but only for less than a tenth of a second.

The other factor with extension leads plugged into extension leads is that this introduces another set of, potentially resistive, brushing contacts, reliant on spring pressure to ensure a good contact. These can very easily have enough contact surface to provide a low impedance at low currents, but not enough surface area to provide low impedance at high currents. It only needs an extra few ohms to go into circuit to limit the fault current so that the protective device will not trip (quickly - or even at all). That high resistance point will, of course, rise to a very high temperature, very quickly, under those conditions. Hence the fire risk.


An ELCB is an /additional/ safety device. It should never be a substitute for correct fault-clearance design.

Never plug extension leads into extension leads. But, if you really must, at least fit a lower rating fuse.

Yep - no disagreement with all that but it does little to support your original suggestion!

My original suggestion:

"Plugging an extension cord into an extension cord is not a good idea. You can easily end up with too high an earth impedance - which greatly increases the risk of fatal shock and fire. "

"If you simply must do it, replace the fuse in the second extension with a 5A one and limit the load to under that. It quite possibly is well under that, already (ie <1.2kW). A fuse is only a few pence and only takes a moment to change. Compare that to how much time and cost would be involved if there was a fire..."

The above totally supports my original syggestion...

Your examples and web link argument relates to distribution box fuses that protect ring mains or radial circuits - NOT fuses in 13A plugs or extension blocks.

No, it relates to *thermal fuses* - exactly the same type of fuse fitted to 13A plugs and extension blocks. It clearly shows the time v current characteristics of thermal fuses of different current ratings.


Anyone relying on these to prevent a spontaneous short circuit (what you were essentially saying) would be daft anyway - they are only there to protect the ring or radial circuit.

Fuses are not there to "prevent a spontaneous short circuit" - they are there to clear such faults.

Getting back to the extension leads - they use far more efficient fuses and in any case they protect the specific extension lead - not the device.

Define "efficient fuse". The cartridge fuses in plugs and extension leads obey exactly the same laws of physics as thermal fuses in distrbution panels. They have the same problem in clearing faults quickly where the fault current is very constrained, eg by too high an earth impedance.

Now - each item plugged into the extension lead will of course be properly fused to protect that specific item - and will likely be 3A or perhaps 5A for typical PC items.

The only remotely sensible point you have made. However it is quite possible to plug a 13A unit in. Indeed, probable in many situations. The office cold in the morning? How about plugging in a fan heater, where you work? Happens all the time..

On this basis, I still fail to see your point.
If you're essentially on about doubling up protection then the original point was - well pointless made really!
But that wasn't your original point!

My point was and remains that plugging extension leads into extension leads is inherently dangerous. A real possibility exists that a fire will result. A real possibility exists that a fatal electric shock will result.

My secondary point remains that, if you must do so, then derating the fuse in the extension lead is a good idea. It would prevent anyone using a high current unit individually fused at 13A. As I have shown such an item, if it develops a fault, can present dangerously high voltages on exposed metalwork for long enough to kill. It can cause a fire.



--
Sue

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>