|
|
Frank Batschulat wrote
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:32 +0100, Dennis <corovita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > ufs
> > magic 11954 format dynamic time Wed Feb 21 14:28:15 2007
> > sblkno 16 cblkno 24 iblkno 32 dblkno 760
> > sbsize 2048 cgsize 8192 cgoffset 64 cgmask 0xffffffc0
> > ncg 93 size 4530330 blocks 4461120
> > bsize 8192 shift 13 mask 0xffffe000
> > fsize 1024 shift 10 mask 0xfffffc00
> > frag 8 shift 3 fsbtodb 1
> > minfree 1% maxbpg 2048 optim time
> > maxcontig 7 rotdelay 0ms rps 60
> > csaddr 760 cssize 2048 shift 9 mask 0xfffffe00
> > ntrak 48 nsect 128 spc 6144 ncyl 1475
> > cpg 16 bpg 6144 fpg 49152 ipg 5824
> > nindir 2048 inopb 64 nspf 2
> > nbfree 0 ndir 15704 nifree 381641 nffree 135498
> > cgrotor 52 fmod 0 ronly 0 logbno 1568
> > rolled 2 si 1 flags 0
> > version 2
> > fs_reclaim FS_RECLAIM
> > Dateisystem-Status gÃltig,
> > fsclean ist -3
> > BlÃcke verfÃgbar in jeder Drehposition
>
> so you formerly claimed:
>
> <snip>
> unknon ufs NOTICE: alloc /: file system full
> Thats impossile: There must be at least 90 GB free space
> <snip end>
>
> thats not possible since / is about 34.56 GB in size, since
> you have fs->fs_size = 4530330 (number of blocks in fs)
> * block size of 8k fs->fs_bsize = 8192 makes up a ~ 34.56 GB file system.
Is fs->fs_bsize == 8192 the correct unit for fs->fs_size and
fs->fs_blocks ?
Isn't it fs->fs_fsize ?
I'd say this is a 4.5GB filesystem. Which can easily be filled with a full
Solaris Developer Express installation...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
ufs-discuss mailing list
ufs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|