[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ubuntu SELinux status.

Subject: Re: Ubuntu SELinux status.
From: Roger
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:51:41 -0400
That is what I feared.
Hopefully Canonical will choose AppArmor as the default
or something but try to match the quality of SELinux in Red Hat as
well for those who prefer
SELinux. Instead of not dropping SELinux.

-r

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Hal Burgiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 06:26:43PM +0100, Avi Greenbury wrote:
>> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SELinux
>> >
>> > as the first hit ...
>> >
>>
>> In general, the distro's own page is a pretty poor place to go to find
>> out how well they've implemented something. The users of that feature
>> under that distro are a far better bet.
>> Unfortunately, I'm not one of those.
>
> My impression is Canonical is moving away from SELinux and adopting apparmor
> in its place. Not to say you can't make it work, but I'd suspect some hair
> pulling, etc at some point.
>
> --
> Hal
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>

-- 
ubuntu-users mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>