ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ubuntu SELinux status.

Subject: Re: Ubuntu SELinux status.
From: Roger
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:48:39 -0400
It's funny that you mention Debian because I was really thinking that
Debian should have been my choice for servers.

-r

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:26 AM,  <christopher.lemire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree about no alternatives. Though I have it and seems obvious bugs to 
> anyone, the devs have not fixed. However I think it works just fine under 
> Debian. Ubuntu is too noob oriented for them to ship with SELinux like Fedora 
> does. I'd been using Fedora since its early days when you had to be a hacker 
> to get everything to work right.
> ------Original Message------
> From: Roger
> Sender: ubuntu-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ReplyTo: Ubuntu user technical support,not for general discussions
> Subject: Ubuntu SELinux status.
> Sent: Oct 22, 2009 11:56 AM
>
> Hello all,
>
> How well implemented is SELinux under Ubuntu when compared to Red Hat?
> An alternative to SELinux is not an option.
>
> Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,
>
> Roger
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>

-- 
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>