|
|
It's funny that you mention Debian because I was really thinking that
Debian should have been my choice for servers.
-r
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:26 AM, <christopher.lemire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree about no alternatives. Though I have it and seems obvious bugs to
> anyone, the devs have not fixed. However I think it works just fine under
> Debian. Ubuntu is too noob oriented for them to ship with SELinux like Fedora
> does. I'd been using Fedora since its early days when you had to be a hacker
> to get everything to work right.
> ------Original Message------
> From: Roger
> Sender: ubuntu-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ReplyTo: Ubuntu user technical support,not for general discussions
> Subject: Ubuntu SELinux status.
> Sent: Oct 22, 2009 11:56 AM
>
> Hello all,
>
> How well implemented is SELinux under Ubuntu when compared to Red Hat?
> An alternative to SELinux is not an option.
>
> Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,
>
> Roger
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
|
|