|
|
Mario Vukelic wrote:
> The option "Anyone that refuses to carry binary-only drivers, so that
> all others will also benefit, as it will require documented hardware"
> was added by a guest, and it's the only sensible option to choose.
>
>
So you are suggesting;
We buy the hardware (company makes profit).
We don't use the drivers they provide (no hardware acceleration).
They open source their drivers and hardware specs (exactly WHY would
they do that?).
They've already made their profit. The drivers are given away free...
if we choose to cripple our machines, how is that hurting them?
Idealistic, yes. "Sensible"? Hardly.
--
Blessings
Wulfmann
Wulf Credo:
Respect the elders. Teach the young. Co-operate with the pack.
Play when you can. Hunt when you must. Rest in between.
Share your affections. Voice your opinion. Leave your Mark.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
|
|