|
|
Nik wrote:
> In article <575131af0709170746s3df3d2dcp1b4229153d39073c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Liam Proven <lproven@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 17/09/2007, Nik <nik@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > In article
>> <575131af0709160908g4e94d9b4y4ec4242a080f8799@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> > Liam Proven <lproven@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > Here is a summary of what's going on, as per my understanding.
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> > Please post this sort of thing to sounder
>
>> Not on it, don't really want to be, and it was answering a question in
>> this list.
> How is anyone supposed to know that?
By having read the original thread in which he stated he was going to
post it separately so as not to override the original thread?
> Where are the refences in your email header?
Not present since it was not a direct reply.
> Where are the inline quotes which relate to your 'answers' ?
Not present since it was not a direct reply.
However both your messages are a prime examples of something that should
have been delivered in private. Just because *you* aren't aware and
unappreciative doesn't mean everyone else is.
--
Steve Lamb
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
|
|