|
|
On Sunday 16 September 2007 21:23:02 Wulfy wrote:
> James Takac wrote:
> > However the argument also cuts the other way. If the hardware
> > manufacturer is made aware of a growing market for their product that
> > doesn't use the bundled drivers and indeed is in need of another driver
> > (e.g. linux vs windows driver), then it's obviously in their best
> > interests to accomodate these alternate users.
>
> But wouldn't they just say "we provide a driver, if you don't want to us
> it, that's your choice"? As far as I can see, the only way this would
> hurt them is if there were a video card with open source, accelerated
> driver available, which we could purchase *instead* of their hardware.
> I don't know of any such hardware.
>
> --
> Blessings
>
> Wulfmann
>
> Wulf Credo:
> Respect the elders. Teach the young. Co-operate with the pack.
> Play when you can. Hunt when you must. Rest in between.
> Share your affections. Voice your opinion. Leave your Mark.
Hi Wulfman
Exactly
James
Ps
The elders know when to listen to the young ;)
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
|
|