|
|
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Derek Broughton wrote:
>> The difference is simple. Apple makes hardware. Microsoft doesn't.
>> It's perfectly acceptable (and proper) to provide the software to make
>> hardware
>> work. Microsoft, however, forces vendors to package Windows with their
>> own
>> hardware. That's an illegal business practice, and many courts have told
>> them so.
>
> Then the courts should tell Apple the same thing. And you should
> stop repeating falsehoods. From
<http://www.apple.com/macpro/specs.html>:
Excuse me, the only falsehoods here are from people who know nothing about
law or manufacturing. Apple is _still_ a hardware maker. How has their
status as a manufacturer changed by moving from a Motorola based platform
to an Intel one?
It's fine to disagree, but calling me a liar is beyond the pale.
<plonk>
--
derek
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
|
|