ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ip tables and NAT

Subject: Re: Ip tables and NAT
From: Mike Bird
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:07:35 -0800
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 10:47, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > Another useful
> > > iptables feature is NAT, which is also trivial to set up with
> > > firestarter.
> > 
> > Rule #1: NAT is not firewalling. I'll repeat that: NAT is not 
> > firewalling. NAT on the local machine is nonsensical. NAT is by 
> > definition a gateway function. Unless you are doing edge cases like 
> > NATing to several virtual machines on the local box, in which case 
> > you probably know enough about packet filtering to write your own 
> > script
> 
> It's hard to imagine a situation where NAT would be needed on
> a workstation.  Nevertheless, NAT is a very effective form of
> firewalling on a gateway.

Correcting for my own failure of imagination:

A common case of workstation NAT is two or three workstations
on a home LAN, with one of them connected to the ISP.

--Mike Bird


-- 
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>