| Subject: | Re: Solaris: The Most Advanced OS? |
|---|---|
| From: | Mariusz Kruk |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:19:50 +0100 |
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe napisaÅ(a): Lovely defence... By the way I hear that loads of server admins tend to avoid the 2.6 kernels, implying that they regard the 2.4 series more stable. Can anyone confirm if it's actually so or if it's more of paranoia? I had oopses on early 2.6 kernels when doing some iptables rules changes. So I stayed with 2.4. Don't have time to test it every time new 2.6 comes out. -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
| Previous by Date: | Fwd: Please Help, I'm begging you: new Powerbook install problem 5.10, Steve Calvin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Solaris: The Most Advanced OS?, Paul Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Solaris: The Most Advanced OS?, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Solaris: The Most Advanced OS?, Lee Braiden |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |