|
|
volvoguy Wrote:
> On 8/20/05, Harry Wert <hwert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I had to revert to my earlier kernel as I had the same problem.
> > Fortunately, I never upgrade without keeping a working kernel in Grub
> for
> > just this reason. FWIW
>
> I thought of doing that, but unfortunately the upgrade process didn't
> work as I expected it to. I could have sworn that in the past, when
> new kernels were made available, they were added to /boot and Grub. In
> this case it appears that it replaced the existing kernel (both the
> 686-smp that I usually use, and 386 which usually always works).
I was just sitting here thinking the same: It's been a while, but I can
swear that earlier, this was the case - at least when I ran Hoary before
it was considered stable. And since this is good behaviour, I'm also
sure I didn't change this. Is this something that has been changed in
the system, or was it that it failed miserably this upgrade? Earlier,
as I recall, kernels disappeared from boot menu when I manually deleted
them, and all kernels were kept in synaptic. Now they just seem to be
gone... :-/
--
stoffe
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
|
|