On Sun, 2006-30-07 at 17:05 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:52:12AM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> > On 7/31/06, Matt Zimmerman <mdz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:38:02AM +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > >> I know but you missed my point. Why should an efficient app (Gthumb) be
> > >> replaced with one thats considerably more inefficient by default?
> > >
> > >I didn't notice gthumb being replaced.
> > Wasn't there like a policy of only having one programm of a type in
> > the default install to .. hmm .. not confuse the users?
> Stick Notes isn't a proper application; it's a panel applet. We have panel
> applets for all sorts of things, but also ship applications with similar
> functionality because they fill different needs.
> > And now the plan is to have two sticky note applications and two photo
> > managers in the default install? Isn't that slightly confusing?
> No authoritative decision has been taken regarding gthumb, and there isn't
> much point in speculating. Any discussion will take place here.
Just a quick note that F-spot is nowhere as good as gthumb for printing
yet. Gthumb will allow you to put 1,2,4 etc photos on a page which
f-spot currently doesn't do.
ubuntu-devel mailing list