| Subject: | Re: scan_ffs from OpenBSD ported and improved. |
|---|---|
| From: | Peter Postma |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:01:11 +0200 |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:22:43AM +0200, Juan RP wrote: > Attached is the patch with all your suggestions fixed, except the second > suggestion (inconsistent spacing in multiple operators), I leave them as is > because I think they are better to understand IMHO (der mouse said so > too). > > Note that the manpage might need a review (wiz, snj?). > > Thank you to all for your comments. Why the rename from scan_ffs to scanffs? This seems inconsistent with other utilities, at least fsck_ffs. -- Peter Postma |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: guidelines for common code patterns?, Martin Husemann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: init(8) - multiuser under chroot, Lubomir Sedlacik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: scan_ffs from OpenBSD ported and improved., Julio M. Merino Vidal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: scan_ffs from OpenBSD ported and improved., Simon Burge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |