Re: ingres and atomicity

Subject:	Re: ingres and atomicity
From:	Joerg Sonnenberger
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:49:31 +0200

On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:50:28AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> However some architectures (eg sparc) do not give you the required 
> sequencing of reads and writes - so any such attempt is doomed to failure.

Doesn't the Load-Link / Store Conditional allow exactly that?
Sorry, didn't have time for assembly on my sparc book yet :)

Joerg

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: ingres and atomicity, (continued) Re: ingres and atomicity, James K. Lowden Message not available Re: ingres and atomicity, James K. Lowden Re: ingres and atomicity, David Laight Re: ingres and atomicity, Jason Thorpe Re: ingres and atomicity, James K. Lowden Re: ingres and atomicity, der Mouse Re: ingres and atomicity, James K. Lowden Re: ingres and atomicity, der Mouse Re: ingres and atomicity, David Laight Re: ingres and atomicity, der Mouse Re: ingres and atomicity, Joerg Sonnenberger <= Re: ingres and atomicity, David Laight Re: ingres and atomicity, Martin Husemann Re: ingres and atomicity, der Mouse Re: ingres and atomicity, Klaus Klein Re: ingres and atomicity, Ignatios Souvatzis Re: ingres and atomicity, Jason Thorpe Re: ingres and atomicity, Rick Kelly Re: ingres and atomicity, James K. Lowden Re: ingres and atomicity, Rick Kelly Re: ingres and atomicity, James K. Lowden

Previous by Date:	Re: [Summer of code] Sftp server, der Mouse
Next by Date:	Re: ingres and atomicity, David Laight
Previous by Thread:	Re: ingres and atomicity, der Mouse
Next by Thread:	Re: ingres and atomicity, David Laight
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]