|
|
I have not seem an architecture document for tapestry 4. In tapestry
3, the yellow book (Howard's) was basically an architecture document.
I have not heard of plans for Howard to write a new edition for
tapestry 4, it's possible that Ken Tong does it, but have not heard of
it.
Your best documentation is really Ken's Enojoying Web development with
Tapestry, he made final changes for tapestry 4 final. You should
have a link for this from Ken, if you don't let me know.
I still feel Tapestry has a role to play because of its excellent
architecture. However, if standards are a most, then SEAM would be my
choice.
Take care
On 12/27/05, hari ks <hari_tcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi,
> Is there a well written tapestry framework
> architecture document?
> JSF has its architecture documented in its J2EE
> tutorial 1.4. I am able to understand how things work
> inside jsf because of this.
>
> Tapestry has much easier component development. Other
> than that, what are other significant advantages in
> tapestry? (With facelets and exadel's studio pro, html
> type of view is made possible in JSF for any
> thirdparty components. ).
>
> Hari.
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
--
Peace and Grace, Carlos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|