On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Bill Kendrick <nbs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:21:15PM -0500, Donny Viszneki wrote:
>> Quite CPU hungry probably for the reason of a naive CA implementation,
> I don't see it taking much on my end.
Well I suppose by modern standards it's next to nothing, but for a
game with pong-era graphics, it's surprisingly CPU heavy (15% or 20%
of my 1GHz Athlon? It might be my crappy 2D graphics drivers pushing
the CPU usage up, too.)
> And sorry for my continued
> naivety, but "CA implementation?" :)
CA = cellular automata
> Sorry... sick, tired & have a sick wife and baby.
> I'm surprised I was able to code this to begin with. ;)
SDL mailing list