Mean free path, John Schutkeker, 2006/12/31

• Re: Mean free path, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/31
• Re: Mean free path, mmeron, 2006/12/31

Landers on moon invisible?, malibu, 2006/12/31

• Re: Landers on moon invisible?, Eric Gisse, 2006/12/31
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/31
  • Re: Landers on moon invisible?, malibu, 2006/12/31
    • Re: Landers on moon invisible?, malibu, 2006/12/31
      • Re: Landers on moon invisible?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/31
        • Re: Landers on moon invisible?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/31
          • Re: Landers on moon invisible?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/31
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/31
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/31
  • Re: Landers on moon invisible?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
• Re: Landers on moon invisible?, CWatters, 2006/12/31

Cerenkov light, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/12/31

• Re: Cerenkov light, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
  • Re: Cerenkov light, andy everett, 2006/12/31
    • Re: Cerenkov light, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
      • Re: Cerenkov light, Michael Moroney, 2006/12/31
        • Re: Cerenkov light, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
      • Re: Cerenkov light, Eric Gisse, 2006/12/31

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.1: U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10, OsherD, 2006/12/31

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.1: U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10, OsherD, 2006/12/31

Really super-heavy atoms in space, mike3, 2006/12/31

• Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/31
  • Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
    • Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/31
      • Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31

passive radar theory refrence needed, Peter Divos, 2006/12/31

• Re: passive radar theory refrence needed, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/12/31
  • Re: passive radar theory refrence needed, Jan Panteltje, 2006/12/31
• Re: passive radar theory refrence needed, Gareth, 2006/12/31

What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?, andy everett, 2006/12/31

• Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/31
• Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?, Pmb, 2006/12/31
  • Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?, andy everett, 2006/12/31
• Re: What is a rough estimate for the max radial electric field in the sun?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/31

Elements w/ unpaired neutrons, Mark Waugh, 2006/12/31

• Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/31
• Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/31
• Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons, Uncle Al, 2006/12/31
  • Re: Elements w/ unpaired neutrons, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31

jet engine, STUARTe, 2006/12/30

• Re: jet engine, Greg Neill, 2006/12/30
• Re: jet engine, Sorcerer, 2006/12/30
• Re: jet engine, unsettled, 2006/12/30
• Re: jet engine, Paul Cardinale, 2006/12/30
  • Re: jet engine, STUARTe, 2006/12/30
    • Re: jet engine, jimp, 2006/12/31
      • Re: jet engine, unsettled, 2006/12/31
      • Re: jet engine, STUARTe, 2006/12/31
        • Re: jet engine, jimp, 2006/12/31
    • Re: jet engine, Greg Neill, 2006/12/31
    • Re: jet engine, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
• Re: jet engine, Gareth, 2006/12/31

Hey Sharon :-), MathFreak NoMore, 2006/12/30

• Re: Hey Sharon :-), hanson, 2006/12/30
  • Re: Hey Sharon :-), MathFreak NoMore, 2006/12/30

Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Seven Seas Oscirius, 2006/12/30

• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
  • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Seven Seas Oscirius, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
  • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Ditto, 2006/12/30
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/30
  • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/30
      • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/30
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/30
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sue..., 2006/12/30
  • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sue..., 2006/12/30
      • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/30
        • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/30
          • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/30
            • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/30
              • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/30
              • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/31
              • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sue..., 2006/12/31
              • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Uncle Al, 2006/12/30
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Ditto, 2006/12/30
  • Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, srp, 2006/12/30
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/30

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View, OsherD, 2006/12/30

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View, OsherD, 2006/12/30
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View, Mpilot, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View, OsherD, 2006/12/31
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View, Mpilot, 2006/12/30
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View, OsherD, 2006/12/31

Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel. I made it out of clay!, CoreyWhite, 2006/12/30

• Re: Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel. I made it out of clay!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
• Re: Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel. I made it out of clay!, hanson, 2006/12/30

REALITY and a model to represent it., globarr, 2006/12/30

• Re: REALITY and a model to represent it., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/30
• Re: REALITY and a model to represent it., Sorcerer, 2006/12/30

Transporting entire icebergs to Africa, Brablo, 2006/12/30

• Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/30
  • Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa, Randy Poe, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa, John Baez, 2006/12/30
      • Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa, Brablo, 2006/12/31
        • Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/31
• Re: Transporting entire icebergs to Africa, M. Ranjit Mathews, 2006/12/30

The new wheel, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/29

• Re: The new wheel, hanson, 2006/12/29
  • Re: The new wheel, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/29
  • Re: The new wheel, Sorcerer, 2006/12/30
    • Re: The new wheel, hanson, 2006/12/30
      • Re: The new wheel, Sorcerer, 2006/12/30
        • Re: The new Aether, hanson, 2006/12/30
        • Re: The new wheel, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
          • Re: The new wheel, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/30
            • Re: The Æther vortex, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
              • Re: The Æther vortex, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
      • Re: The new wheel, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
    • Re: The new wheel, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
• Re: The new wheel, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29
  • Re: The new wheel, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/29
  • Re: The new wheel, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/29
  • Re: The new wheel, John Schutkeker, 2006/12/31
    • Re: The new wheel, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/31
      • Re: The new wheel, John Schutkeker, 2006/12/31

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas, OsherD, 2006/12/29

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas, OsherD, 2006/12/29

For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29

• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, kenseto, 2006/12/29
  • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29
    • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/29
      • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29
    • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, kenseto, 2006/12/29
      • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/29
        • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/30
      • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/31
        • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/31
          • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/31
            • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/31
              • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/31
        • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, boson boss, 2006/12/31
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, brad, 2006/12/29
  • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, boson boss, 2006/12/29
    • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, brad, 2006/12/30
      • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, boson boss, 2006/12/30
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, schoenfeld . one, 2006/12/30
  • Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/30

Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????, PD, 2006/12/29

• Re: Question: In SR is a clock second an interval of universal time?????, PD, 2006/12/30

Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius, Thomas Smid, 2006/12/29

• Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/12/30
• Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius, Eric Gisse, 2006/12/29
• Re: Radial Density function and Bohr Radius, malibu, 2006/12/29

String Theory: Physics or Theology?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29

• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?, Uncle Al, 2006/12/29
  • Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?, Thomas Johnson, 2006/12/31
• Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/30

lagrangian in relativity, Ass. Cult. Micene, 2006/12/29

• Re: lagrangian in relativity, Pmb, 2006/12/30
  • Re: lagrangian in relativity, Ass. Cult. Micene, 2006/12/30

Does absorption in semiconductors results from density of states ?, Andrew, 2006/12/29

• Re: Does absorption in semiconductors results from density of states ?, boson boss, 2006/12/29

"The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Teg, 2006/12/29

• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Teg, 2006/12/29

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach, OsherD, 2006/12/29

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach, OsherD, 2006/12/29
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach, OsherD, 2006/12/29
    • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach, nospam, 2006/12/29

Quick electron flow question, Robin, 2006/12/29

• Re: Quick electron flow question, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29

Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 2006/12/29

• Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, hanson, 2006/12/29
  • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, huangxienchen, 2006/12/29
    • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Mackie, 2006/12/29
      • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 2006/12/29
      • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, werty, 2006/12/30
  • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, huangxienchen, 2006/12/29
  • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 2006/12/29
    • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, hanson, 2006/12/29
  • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Fred Kasner, 2006/12/30
    • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, hanson, 2006/12/30
      • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Fred Kasner, 2006/12/30
      • Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 2006/12/31

where secret societies come from, galathaea, 2006/12/28

• Re: where secret societies come from, guenther vonKnakspot, 2006/12/30
  • consequences of the noise paradox, galathaea, 2006/12/31

How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, cafeinst, 2006/12/28

• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, T Wake, 2006/12/28
  • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/28
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, jimp, 2006/12/28
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/28
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/28
  • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, srp, 2006/12/29
  • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, cafeinst, 2006/12/29
    • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/29
    • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, srp, 2006/12/29
      • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, cafeinst, 2006/12/29
        • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, srp, 2006/12/29
          • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, cafeinst, 2006/12/29
            • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, srp, 2006/12/29
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, srp, 2006/12/30
          • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/29
        • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
    • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, T Wake, 2006/12/29
      • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, malibu, 2006/12/29
        • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/29
          • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, malibu, 2006/12/29
            • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/29
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, malibu, 2006/12/29
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/29
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/29
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, T Wake, 2006/12/29
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/30
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, malibu, 2006/12/30
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, malibu, 2006/12/30
              • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
    • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Edwards, 2006/12/29
      • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, cafeinst, 2006/12/29
      • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, srp, 2006/12/29
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/12/29
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, PD, 2006/12/29
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Edward Green, 2006/12/29
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
• Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Martin Hogbin, 2006/12/30
  • Re: How many people know that quantum mechanics is correct?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/30

questions about Einstein's equation, Barrow, 2006/12/28

• Re: questions about Einstein's equation, carlip-nospam, 2006/12/28

Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Stan, 2006/12/28

• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Greg Neill, 2006/12/28
    • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
    • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, unsettled, 2006/12/28
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Sorcerer, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Mike, 2006/12/29
    • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Sorcerer, 2006/12/29
      • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/12/29
        • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, unsettled, 2006/12/29
        • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Ben Newsam, 2006/12/29
          • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, unsettled, 2006/12/29
          • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, jimp, 2006/12/29
          • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, jmfbahciv, 2006/12/30
        • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Stan, 2006/12/30
        • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
          • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/12/31
            • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Sorcerer, 2006/12/31
  • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Stan, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
• Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Prai Jei, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/29
  • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Stan, 2006/12/29
  • Re: Will anglo-saxons ever go metric ???, Stan, 2006/12/30

evidence gathered so far that supports the Atom Totality theory and shows Big Bang to be a fake, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28

• Re: evidence gathered so far that supports the Atom Totality theory and shows Big Bang to be a fake, Proginoskes, 2006/12/28
• Tifft quantized galaxy speeds Re: evidence gathered so far that supports the Atom Totality theory and shows Big Bang to be a fake, a_plutonium, 2006/12/30
  • Re: Tifft quantized galaxy speeds Re: evidence gathered so far that supports the Atom Totality theory and shows Big Bang to be a fake, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Tifft quantized galaxy speeds Re: evidence gathered so far that supports the Atom Totality theory and shows Big Bang to be a fake, a_plutonium, 2006/12/31
      • Re: Tifft quantized galaxy speeds Re: evidence gathered so far that supports the Atom Totality theory and shows Big Bang to be a fake, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/31

Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us, himalayahill@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/28

• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
• Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us, Sorcerer, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us, himalayahill@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
    • Re: Download Einstein's original papers from www.ajayonline.us, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/30

Infinity mirror question, Robin, 2006/12/28

• Re: Infinity mirror question, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/28
• Re: Infinity mirror question, Sorcerer, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Infinity mirror question, Robin, 2006/12/29
    • Re: Infinity mirror question, Sorcerer, 2006/12/29
    • Re: Infinity mirror question, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
      • Re: Infinity mirror question, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30

"How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Teg, 2006/12/27

• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", malibu, 2006/12/28
  • Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", srp, 2006/12/28

Re: Decorated Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming, z, 2006/12/27

• Re: Decorated Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming, kdthrge, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Decorated Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Decorated Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming, news.cogeco.ca, 2006/12/28
• Re: Decorated Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming, news.cogeco.ca, 2006/12/28

Re: Can magnetism exist without electric charges?, Choong, 2006/12/27

• Re: Can magnetism exist without electric charges?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/27

Chemtrail weather modification (CONFIRMED), schoenfeld . one, 2006/12/27

• Re: Chemtrail weather modification (CONFIRMED), BDK, 2006/12/27

A question about scientific truth, Jonathan Sturm, 2006/12/27

• Re: A question about scientific truth, mmeron, 2006/12/27
  • Re: A question about scientific truth, Jonathan Sturm, 2006/12/27
    • Re: A question about scientific truth, mmeron, 2006/12/27
      • Re: A question about scientific truth, Jonathan Sturm, 2006/12/27
        • Re: A question about scientific truth, mmeron, 2006/12/27
• Re: A question about scientific truth, Sorcerer, 2006/12/27
• Re: A question about scientific truth, Neil Bates, 2006/12/27
  • Re: A question about scientific truth, Jonathan Sturm, 2006/12/27
• Re: A question about scientific truth, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/27

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 58.0: The Big Rip, OsherD, 2006/12/27

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 58.0: The Big Rip, OsherD, 2006/12/27

Re: Commendations To George Bush, Edward Green, 2006/12/27

• Re: Commendations To George Bush, T Wake, 2006/12/27

A question about quantum computations, hatemghani, 2006/12/26

• Re: A question about quantum computations, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/12/28

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification, OsherD, 2006/12/26

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification, OsherD, 2006/12/26
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification, Harvy Resiling, 2006/12/27
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 57.0: c-->infinity and h-->0, infinity Unification, Harvy Resiling, 2006/12/27

"Merry" this one for Christmas :-), MathFreak NoMore, 2006/12/26

• Re: "Merry" this one for Christmas :-), hanson, 2006/12/26

Re: Interstitial Bodies & Reference Frames in SR, Lester Zick, 2006/12/26

• Re: Interstitial Bodies & Reference Frames in SR, Lester Zick, 2006/12/26
• Re: Interstitial Bodies & Reference Frames in SR, George Dishman, 2006/12/26
• Re: Interstitial Bodies & Reference Frames in SR, Lester Zick, 2006/12/28
  • Re: Interstitial Bodies & Reference Frames in SR, George Dishman, 2006/12/29
• Re: Interstitial Bodies & Reference Frames in SR, Jeff Root, 2006/12/31

Spin apart water molecules, Martin Winer, 2006/12/26

• Re: Spin apart water molecules, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/26

Electrostatic field, mohammad . esmaeili, 2006/12/26

• Re: Electrostatic field, Sue..., 2006/12/26
  • Re: Electrostatic field, Sorcerer, 2006/12/26
• Re: Electrostatic field, Sorcerer, 2006/12/26
• Re: Electrostatic field, Meir Achuz, 2006/12/26
• Electrostatic field, mohammad . esmaeili, 2006/12/26

Why does fire have a shadow??, hmz6, 2006/12/26

• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/26
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Ian Parker, 2006/12/26
  • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/27
    • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, hmz6, 2006/12/27
      • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Edward Green, 2006/12/28
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/26
  • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Ian Parker, 2006/12/26
    • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/26
      • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, hmz6, 2006/12/26
        • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/26
      • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Edward Green, 2006/12/26
        • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/27
          • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Edward Green, 2006/12/27
            • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/27
            • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, jmfbahciv, 2006/12/27
              • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/27
              • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, jmfbahciv, 2006/12/28
              • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Ben Newsam, 2006/12/28
              • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, jmfbahciv, 2006/12/29
              • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
      • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Ian Parker, 2006/12/27
      • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/28
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Y.Porat, 2006/12/26
  • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Edward Green, 2006/12/26
    • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Y.Porat, 2006/12/27
    • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Jewish Cowboy, 2006/12/27
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Edward Green, 2006/12/26
• Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, andy everett, 2006/12/27
  • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, andy everett, 2006/12/27
  • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Sorcerer, 2006/12/27
    • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, andy everett, 2006/12/27
      • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Sorcerer, 2006/12/28
        • Re: Why does fire have a shadow??, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/28

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories, OsherD, 2006/12/26

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories, OsherD, 2006/12/26
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories, OsherD, 2006/12/26
    • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories, OsherD, 2006/12/26
      • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories, Sorcerer, 2006/12/26
      • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/26
        • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 56.0: Quantum and GR Equations Don't Require Quantum/GR Theories, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/26

Isobaric Expansion, renai, 2006/12/26

• Re: Isobaric Expansion, mmeron, 2006/12/26
  • Re: Isobaric Expansion, renai, 2006/12/26
    • Re: Isobaric Expansion, mmeron, 2006/12/26
• Re: Isobaric Expansion, John Baez, 2006/12/30

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.1: Japan, India, Israel Take Up Greene-Morrison-Strominger Research, OsherD, 2006/12/26

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.1: Japan, India, Israel Take Up Greene-Morrison-Strominger Research, OsherD, 2006/12/26

A research, Sourcerer, 2006/12/26

• Re: A research, Sourcerer, 2006/12/26
  • Re: A research, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/26
    • Re: A research, unsettled, 2006/12/26
      • Re: A research, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/26
      • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
  • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
    • Re: A research, Sourcerer, 2006/12/26
      • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
• Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
  • Re: A research, Sourcerer, 2006/12/26
    • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
      • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
      • Re: A research, Sourcerer, 2006/12/26
        • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
        • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
• Re: A research, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/26
• Re: A research, Sorcerer, 2006/12/26
  • Re: A research, Sourcerer, 2006/12/26
    • Re: A research, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
• Re: A research, carlip-nospam, 2006/12/27
• Re: A research, PD, 2006/12/27
• Are we our thoughts or is liquid water required ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/12/28

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.0: Agreement Between PI and Strominger-Greene-Morrison, OsherD, 2006/12/25

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.0: Agreement Between PI and Strominger-Greene-Morrison, OsherD, 2006/12/25
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 55.0: Agreement Between PI and Strominger-Greene-Morrison, OsherD, 2006/12/25

Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., mcholette@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/25

• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., Sue..., 2006/12/25
  • Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., Sorcerer, 2006/12/25
    • Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., hanson, 2006/12/26
      • Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., Sorcerer, 2006/12/26
        • To Aether or not to Aether.... ahahahaha...., hanson, 2006/12/26
          • Re: To Aether or not to Aether.... ahahahaha...., Sorcerer, 2006/12/26
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., Homos Flaccidus, 2006/12/25
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., Martin Hogbin, 2006/12/26
• Re: Measuring Current in a Magnetic Field: A Physics Problem..., Greg Hansen, 2006/12/26

Merry Christmas ya bunch of loons - !!!!!! : ), huangxienchen, 2006/12/25

• Re: Merry Christmas ya bunch of loons - !!!!!! : ), unsettled, 2006/12/25

Barium Titanate powder problems, Sutor78, 2006/12/25

• Re: Barium Titanate powder problems, Sorcerer, 2006/12/25
  • Re: Barium Titanate powder problems, hanson, 2006/12/25
• Re: Barium Titanate powder problems, jimp, 2006/12/25
• Re: Barium Titanate powder problems, hanson, 2006/12/25

It is a "memory" effects in solids?, top9, 2006/12/25

• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/25
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/25
• Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/25
  • Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/25
    • Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, CWatters, 2006/12/25
      • Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, CWatters, 2006/12/25
        • Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/25
      • Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/25
  • Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, top9, 2006/12/25
    • Re: It is a "memory" effects in solids?, CWatters, 2006/12/27

common assumption used for quantum mechanics, hlseck, 2006/12/25

• Re: common assumption used for quantum mechanics, ABarlow, 2006/12/25
• Re: common assumption used for quantum mechanics, Andy Resnick, 2006/12/27
  • Re: common assumption used for quantum mechanics, Y.Porat, 2006/12/27

The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean, Tareq, 2006/12/25

• Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/25
  • Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean, Tareq, 2006/12/25
  • Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean, Tareq, 2006/12/29
    • Re: The value of gravitational acceleration in the ocean, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29

Unexamined thermo question, Edward Green, 2006/12/25

• Re: Unexamined thermo question, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/25
  • Re: Unexamined thermo question, mmeron, 2006/12/25
    • Re: Unexamined thermo question, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/25
    • Re: Unexamined thermo question, Edward Green, 2006/12/25
      • Re: Unexamined thermo question, Jim Black, 2006/12/25
        • Re: Unexamined thermo question, Edward Green, 2006/12/25
          • Re: Unexamined thermo question, Jim Black, 2006/12/26
            • Re: Unexamined thermo question, Edward Green, 2006/12/26
            • Re: Unexamined thermo question, Edward Green, 2006/12/26

IR Fluctuations: z > 7 Objects?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/24

• Re: IR Fluctuations: z > 7 Objects?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/25
  • Re: IR Fluctuations: z > 7 Objects?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/25

Mainstream Antigravity?, The Thing, 2006/12/24

• Re: Mainstream Antigravity?, Sue..., 2006/12/24
  • Re: Mainstream Antigravity?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
    • Re: Mainstream Antigravity?, The Thing, 2006/12/24
  • Re: Mainstream Antigravity?, The Thing, 2006/12/24

A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Teg, 2006/12/24

• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Teg, 2006/12/24

Mr Hawkings ! How long 'till darkness do we part?, MEMS Anonym, 2006/12/24

• Re: Mr Hawkings ! How long 'till darkness do we part?, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/24
  • Re: Mr Hawkings ! How long 'till darkness do we part?, mike . j . harvey, 2006/12/24

The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/24

• Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?, louis, 2006/12/24
• Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?, mike . j . harvey, 2006/12/24
• Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?, srp, 2006/12/25
  • Re: The Speed Of Light Equivalent Of A Sonic Boom?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/25

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 54.0: Big Bang Can't Be "Rounded Off", OsherD, 2006/12/24

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 54.0: Big Bang Can't Be "Rounded Off", OsherD, 2006/12/24

Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?, kguy, 2006/12/24

• Re: Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?, Sue..., 2006/12/24
  • Re: Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
    • Re: Is TIME TRAVEL Possible?, T Wake, 2006/12/24

light photon, malibu, 2006/12/24

• Re: light photon, Mike, 2006/12/24
• Re: light photon, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/24
  • Re: light photon, George, 2006/12/24
    • Re: light photon, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/24
      • Re: light photon, Greg Hansen, 2006/12/24
      • Re: light photon, George, 2006/12/25
• Re: light photon, Sue..., 2006/12/24
  • Re: light photon, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
  • Re: light photon, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24

Interstitial Bodies and Reference Frames in SR, Lester Zick, 2006/12/23

• Re: Interstitial Bodies and Reference Frames in SR, Lester Zick, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Interstitial Bodies and Reference Frames in SR, Lester Zick, 2006/12/25

The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN, vlcek, 2006/12/23

• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/23
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN, Jim Black, 2006/12/24

Introductory Physics Books Suggestions, Jonas, 2006/12/23

• Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/24
• Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions, ABarlow, 2006/12/25
• Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/25
  • Re: Introductory Physics Books Suggestions, Jonas, 2006/12/27

Forecasted Nuclei, vlcek, 2006/12/23

• Re: Forecasted Nuclei, Jim Black, 2006/12/24
  • Re: Forecasted Nuclei, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/12/24
    • Re: Forecasted Nuclei, Jim Black, 2006/12/24
  • Re: Forecasted Nuclei, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/29

Fundamental spheres in nuclei, vlcek, 2006/12/23

• Re: Fundamental spheres in nuclei, malibu, 2006/12/23
• Re: Fundamental spheres in nuclei, MathFreak NoMore, 2006/12/24
• Re: Fundamental spheres in nuclei, Jim Black, 2006/12/24

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe, OsherD, 2006/12/23

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe, OsherD, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe, OsherD, 2006/12/23
    • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe, Karenia Brevis, 2006/12/23
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 53.0: Fundamental Equation of the Universe, louis, 2006/12/23

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv, OsherD, 2006/12/23

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv, OsherD, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv, Sorcerer, 2006/12/23
• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 52.0: Tidal Force Literature in arXiv, louis, 2006/12/23

Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons..., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/23

• Re: Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons..., jimp, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons..., jmfbahciv, 2006/12/23
    • Re: Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons..., jimp, 2006/12/23
      • Re: Our sense of smell could rely on the tunnelling of electrons..., jmfbahciv, 2006/12/24

light photons and EM waves, panfilero, 2006/12/23

• Re: light photons and EM waves, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/23
  • Re: light photons and EM waves, Sue..., 2006/12/24
    • Re: light photons and EM waves, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
• Re: light photons and EM waves, Sorcerer, 2006/12/23
  • Re: light photons and EM waves, panfilero, 2006/12/23
    • Re: light photons and EM waves, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
      • Re: light photons and EM waves, panfilero, 2006/12/24
        • Re: light photons and EM waves, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
          • Re: light photons and EM waves, panfilero, 2006/12/25
            • Re: light photons and EM waves, Sorcerer, 2006/12/25
              • Re: light photons and EM waves, panfilero, 2006/12/25
              • Re: light photons and EM waves, Sorcerer, 2006/12/25
              • Re: light photons and EM waves, panfilero, 2006/12/26

Intelligence Branch of Military in Space, SnitchedAndTortured, 2006/12/23

• Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space, Don Stockbauer, 2006/12/23
• Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space, jimp, 2006/12/23
• Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space, wild weasel, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Intelligence Branch of Military in Space, Chadwick Stone©, 2006/12/23

Relation between elctron movement and power factor, neohunts, 2006/12/23

• Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, jimp, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, neohunts, 2006/12/23
    • Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, jimp, 2006/12/23
      • Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, neohunts, 2006/12/23
        • Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, jimp, 2006/12/23
          • Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, neohunts, 2006/12/23
            • Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, jimp, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Relation between elctron movement and power factor, MathFreak NoMore, 2006/12/23

speed of light, panfilero, 2006/12/22

• Re: speed of light, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/22
• Re: speed of light, Sorcerer, 2006/12/23
• Re: speed of light, srp, 2006/12/23
  • Re: speed of light, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
• Re: speed of light, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/23
  • Re: speed of light, G. L. Bradford, 2006/12/24
• Re: speed of light, Sue..., 2006/12/24
  • Re: speed of light, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24

Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/12/22

• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, hanson, 2006/12/22
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/22
      • 13.7 Giga_Years is merely how far back we can _See_... Today., Jeff…Relf, 2006/12/23
        • Re: 13.7 Giga_Years is merely how far back we can _See_... Today., T Wake, 2006/12/23
        • Re: 13.7 Giga_Years is merely how far back we can _See_... Today., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
      • Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/12/23
        • Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/23
• Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, gert_kemm, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Nature Was smart For Man's Spacetime, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/12/22

Wave Spinning at "c" Relates to Matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/12/22

• Re: Wave Spinning at "c" Relates to Matter, malibu, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Wave Spinning at "c" Relates to Matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/12/23

Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, mountain man, 2006/12/22

• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, mountain man, 2006/12/24
    • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Sorcerer, 2006/12/24
      • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/24
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Jerry, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Sorcerer, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Surfer, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Surfer, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, karandash2000, 2006/12/22
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, karandash2000, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Surfer, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, karandash2000, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Spirit of Truth, 2006/12/27
        • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, karandash2000, 2006/12/27
          • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Spirit of Truth, 2006/12/28
            • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/28
              • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Spirit of Truth, 2006/12/31
              • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Ben Newsam, 2006/12/31
              • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/31
              • Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/31
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment, Tom Roberts, 2006/12/23

Old Physics books, David Findlay, 2006/12/22

• Re: Old Physics books, andy everett, 2006/12/23
  • Re: Old Physics books, David Findlay, 2006/12/23
    • Re: Old Physics books, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/23
    • Re: Old Physics books, MathFreak NoMore, 2006/12/23

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI, OsherD, 2006/12/22

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI, OsherD, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI, OsherD, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI, Sorcerer, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI, DmitryKovtun, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI, OsherD, 2006/12/23
        • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.2: More on Determinants As PI, Sorcerer, 2006/12/23

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.1: Probable Influence/Causation (PI) Implies Infinite Velocity, OsherD, 2006/12/22

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.1: Probable Influence/Causation (PI) Implies Infinite Velocity, OsherD, 2006/12/22

Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, thermate, 2006/12/22

• Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, thermate, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Simon Spiegel, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, thermate, 2006/12/22
        • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Simon Spiegel, 2006/12/22
          • CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, thermate, 2006/12/22
            • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Simon Spiegel, 2006/12/22
              • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, thermate, 2006/12/22
              • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Simon Spiegel, 2006/12/22
              • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, thermate, 2006/12/22
              • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY<snip>, T Wake, 2006/12/22
              • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Simon Spiegel, 2006/12/22
            • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY<snip>, T Wake, 2006/12/22
          • CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, thermate, 2006/12/22
            • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
              • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, T Wake, 2006/12/23
              • Re: CRIMINAL INTERNATIONAL AGENCY Bastard Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
      • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - <snip>, T Wake, 2006/12/22
• Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, karandash2000, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, Mike, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Special Theory Of Relativity Courses - DEFECTIVE , Einstein was a PLAGIARIST and could not therfore explain, karandash2000, 2006/12/22

Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/22

• Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, malibu, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, George, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, AustinMN, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Davoud, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, malibu, 2006/12/22
        • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
          • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, AustinMN, 2006/12/22
            • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, malibu, 2006/12/22
              • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, AustinMN, 2006/12/22
              • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, malibu, 2006/12/22
              • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, AustinMN, 2006/12/22
              • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
              • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/23
              • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, malibu, 2006/12/23
              • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/23
        • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, George, 2006/12/22
          • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, malibu, 2006/12/22
• Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Shawn, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Possible reason why the early universe (after the first stars) is not metal rich, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/22

Do Quantum Non-locality and Relativistic Time Dilation arise form the same underlying physical reality? According to Moving DimensionsTheory, they do., drelliot, 2006/12/22

• Re: Do Quantum Non-locality and Relativistic Time Dilation arise form the same underlying physical reality? According to Moving DimensionsTheory, they do., Sylvia Else, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Do Quantum Non-locality and Relativistic Time Dilation arise form the same underlying physical reality? According to Moving DimensionsTheory, they do., karandash2000, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Do Quantum Non-locality and Relativistic Time Dilation arise form the same underlying physical reality? According to Moving DimensionsTheory, they do., Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Do Quantum Non-locality and Relativistic Time Dilation arise form the same underlying physical reality? According to Moving DimensionsTheory, they do., collection60, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Do Quantum Non-locality and Relativistic Time Dilation arise form the same underlying physical reality? According to Moving DimensionsTheory, they do., Sylvia Else, 2006/12/22
• Re: Do Quantum Non-locality and Relativistic Time Dilation arise form the same underlying physical reality? According to Moving DimensionsTheory, they do., Autymn D. C., 2006/12/22

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI), OsherD, 2006/12/22

• Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI), OsherD, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI), OsherD, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI), OsherD, 2006/12/22

IV law of thermodynamics, grześ, 2006/12/21

• Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/21
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics, T Wake, 2006/12/21
  • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, grześ, 2006/12/21
    • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/21
      • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, grześ, 2006/12/21
        • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, T Wake, 2006/12/22
          • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, grzes, 2006/12/22
            • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
            • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, T Wake, 2006/12/22
      • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Edward Green, 2006/12/22
        • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
        • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
        • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
          • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, T Wake, 2006/12/22
          • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Edward Green, 2006/12/23
            • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
            • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
              • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Edward Green, 2006/12/24
              • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/24
              • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Edward Green, 2006/12/25
            • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/23
        • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/22
    • Re: IV law of thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/12/22
• Re: IV law of thermodynamics, galathaea, 2006/12/22

What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Ditto, 2006/12/21

• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Randy Poe, 2006/12/21
  • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/21
    • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, OG, 2006/12/21
    • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Randy Poe, 2006/12/21
      • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/22
  • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/22
    • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/22
      • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/22
        • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/22
          • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Ken Muldrew, 2006/12/22
            • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/22
          • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/22
          • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/22
            • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/23
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/23
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/24
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/27
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/27
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/28
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/28
    • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Randy Poe, 2006/12/22
      • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/23
        • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/24
          • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/25
            • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/26
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, kunzmilan, 2006/12/27
              • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/27
          • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/25
            • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/25
            • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, mmeron, 2006/12/25
  • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Ditto, 2006/12/22
    • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Edward Green, 2006/12/22
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/21
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Andy Resnick, 2006/12/22
• Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Sue..., 2006/12/28
  • Re: What happens at the interface of two colliding masses?, Sorcerer, 2006/12/28

Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/21

• Re: Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one, Mike, 2006/12/21
• Re: Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one, Matthew Ota, 2006/12/21
• Re: Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one, Uncle Al, 2006/12/21
• Re: Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one, Sam Wormley, 2006/12/22

Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, Zinc Potterman, 2006/12/21

• Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/21
  • Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, Zinc Potterman, 2006/12/21
    • Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/21
• Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, Andy Resnick, 2006/12/22

Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, TedJob, 2006/12/21

• Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, Greg Hansen, 2006/12/22
  • Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, Ken Muldrew, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, mmeron, 2006/12/22
      • Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/26
        • Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, mmeron, 2006/12/26
          • Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/12/27
            • Re: Postdoc on thermal detector technology at University of Minnesota, mmeron, 2006/12/27

Why light makes atoms moving faster?, grześ, 2006/12/21

• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, grześ, 2006/12/21
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, mmeron, 2006/12/21
  • Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, grzes, 2006/12/21
    • Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/21
    • Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, mmeron, 2006/12/21
      • Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, grześ, 2006/12/21
    • Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/12/23
• Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/22
  • Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, malibu, 2006/12/22
    • Re: Why light makes atoms moving faster?, Autymn D. C., 2006/12/22

explaining why neutrons,muons,pions, tau electrons have the meanlife and MEV they