| Subject: | Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space |
|---|---|
| From: | "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:27:24 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics |
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:k5el64-1k2.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | In sci.physics, Sorcerer | <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | wrote | on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:22:23 GMT | <jlSlh.260857$qd7.152136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: | > | > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:3h5l64-tu1.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | > | > [entire diatribe snipped] | > | > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ | > | | Having fun yet? Yeah, I always have fun with fuckwits like you (until bored). Figured out the inertial frame of reference of a hadron yet? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Landers on moon invisible?, Sorcerer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Landers on moon invisible?, CWatters |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Really super-heavy atoms in space, The Ghost In The Machine |
| Next by Thread: | Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.1: U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10, OsherD |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |