| Subject: | Re: Jihad needs scientists |
|---|---|
| From: | unsettled <unsettled@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:14:45 -0600 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.electronics.design, sci.med |
Ken Smith wrote: In article <em3gds$8qk_001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jmfbahciv@xxxxxxx> wrote: [....] Are you really denying people in America are being listened to? Some are but none of it is warrentless. This is flat wrong. Many americans have been and are being listened to without a warrent. Bush claims that no warrent is needed. Do you have some insight into what the activities are of the official US sleuthing business? Does the US constitution extend its protections beyond our borders? [.....] The military commissions bill passed recently denies people held the writ of habeas corpus (check out what Sen. Spector had to say about it). Which people are denied? You are should you Bush happen to want you to be. Be very specific. I don't care whatSpector said about it; there was a campaing and election going on. There still is a campaign going on. You should care. It is the very things that have made the US a free country that are being lost. Then instead of simply talking about it you should be bringing a class action lawsuit. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mean free path, Phineas T Puddleduck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: test, Uncle Al |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Jihad needs scientists, Ken Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Jihad needs scientists, JoeBloe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |