| Subject: | Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11 |
|---|---|
| From: | Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:05:57 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics, soc.culture.usa, sci.crypt, sci.lang |
Antony Clements wrote: [...] which is essentially what i have said. It's vastly different from what you had been saying. objects only fall at 9.8m/s (yes i know it is per second squared but i really couldn't be bothere fishing through the character map to find the little 2 Oh spare us. or trying to remember it'sascii code) in a vacuum, which in reality, only exists in space (for the most part but not entirely a vacuum but the closest one can get in nature) or in a vacuum tube irrespective of size or shape (i said that in one of my posts to Bryan). In a reply to me? Please cite it. I'm glad to see you are learning, but please don't misrepresent the discussion. -- --Bryan |
| Previous by Date: | Really super-heavy atoms in space, mike3 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.1: U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis Maryland Makes Top 10, OsherD |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11, David Taylor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11, Antony Clements |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |