| Subject: | Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11 |
|---|---|
| From: | gordonb.ejr3u@xxxxxxxxxxx (Gordon Burditt) |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:32:17 -0000 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics, alt.politics, soc.culture.usa, sci.crypt, sci.lang |
>> Wrong. The acceleration due to gravity is ~9.8 meters per second per >> second. And that's for all objects, regardless of how much they weigh. > >incorrect. it's basic physics that the more massive an object is the greater >the acceleration due to gravity will be. What universe do you live in? This is Road Runner Cartoon physics. >therefore 9.8m/s for a 1 lb mass is >correct. this can be shown with a lead ball and a rubber ball of the same >area, the lead ball will fall faster because it is more massive. try it >yourself, the difference is there but not very noticeable to the naked eye. Clearly, then, a man wearing a parachute falls at the same speed jumping out of an airplane regardless of whether the parachute opens or not, and the man would fall slower if he didn't use a parachute (which obviously weighs something) at all. So why were parachutes invented? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bell's inequality vs. Kerr Rotation, Sue... |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pascal's wager, Sirius |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11, jmfbahciv |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why the 3rd skyscraper came freefalling down on 9/11, Antony Clements |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |