|
|
G. L. Bradford wrote:
"kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45959606$0$18064$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:RJdlh.331826$1i1.88720@xxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
For the runt wormy: none of those you listed below is in my theory.
Actually I thought your theory had something to say about
>>
>> 4. Devices which can record absolute position. Note that the
existence
>> of such devices would also contradict Galilean relativity.
No such device exist in IRT. In IRT all objects are in a state of absolute
motion so how can IRT has a devvice that can record absolute position????
>>
>> 5. Clocks that are immune to time dilation. Again, this would
require a
>> new force not currently explained by the laws of physics.
Again in IRT time dilation is represented by a clock second contains a
different amount of absolute time in different frames. In fact that's the
reason why all observers measures the same speed of light with his own
clock
and ruler. In IRT the speed of light is defined as a constant math ratio
as
measured by all observer as follows:
Light path length of ruler (299,792,458m lpng physically)/the absolute
time
content for a clock second co-moving with the ruler.
(snip)
Ken Seto
Time does not move. It is expandable or contractible, inflationary or
deflationary (even to negatively inflating or deflating), relatively
speaking, but it does not move. It does not even 'co-move'. Regarding
Relativity, neither does space move. It too is expandable or
contractible..., relatively speaking, but it does not move.
According to 'c' both space and time are absolute -- "space-time" is an
absolute -- but that absolutism is balloon quality expandable here,
contractible there, relative to any observer but THE Observer in THE
Inertial Frame. The baseline observer in the baseline frame. The one single
God of Scale and Scaling.
According to Relativity the space and time of c will always be measurably
the same constant for the expanded or the contracted (no difference in any
local measurement of c). But the expanded space and time of c, for the
expanded space-time observer, has to break out -- shatter into -- into many
differing spaces and times, each [one] of the many contracted space-times
corresponding to the space-time of some [one] contracted observer. The
expanded observer incorporates the many differing contracted space-times of
the many differing contracted observers into his own singularly local and
different space-time frame relative to him alone (just like each one of the
many contracted observers then singularly incorporated as far as he and his
expanded frame is concerned).
Constants, such as 'c', are hyper-dimensional in quality. Thus its
space-time (thus 'space-time' itself) -- what it is -- is intrinsically
hyper-quality. It can parcel or de-parcel (particulate or de-particulate),
but it cannot and will not move. Not even 'co-move'.
GLB
"Mumbo Jumbo, rhubarb rhubarb Tickety bubarb yak yak yak"...
- "Stop the world, I want to get off" (1966)
pgs 391-392, "The Elegant Universe", Brian Greene (1999)
"5. For the mathematically inclined reader, we note that from the
spacetime position 4-vector x = (ct, x_sub1, x_sub2, x_sub3) = ct, x_bar
we can produce the velocity 4-vector u = dx/dtau, where tau is the proper
time defined by dtau^2 = dt^2 - c^-2 (dx_sub1^2 + dx_sub2^2 +dx_sub3^2).
Then, the "speed through spacetime" is the magnitude of the 4-vector u,
[((c^2 dt^2 - dx_bar^2)/(dt^2 - c^-2 dx_bar^2))]^0.5, which is identically
the speed of light, c. Now, we can rearrange the equation c^2 (dt/dtau)^2
- (dx_bar/dtau)^2 = c^2, to be c^2 (dtau/dt)^2 + (dx_bar/dt)^2 = c^2. This
shows than an increase in an object's speed through space, [(dx_bar/dt)^2]^0.5
must be accompanied by a decrease in dtau/dt, the latter being the object's
speed through time (the rate at which time elapses on its own clock, dtau,
as compared with that on our stationary clock, dt)".
|
|