| Subject: | Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids? |
|---|---|
| From: | richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin) |
| Date: | 30 Dec 2006 12:42:40 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics.electromag |
In article <1167474272.608416.12480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Seven Seas Oscirius <brightice2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >The atoms in solids are bonded rigidly en masse with electronic bonds. >And the propagation speed of distubances in electromagnetic fields is c. Inertia. -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: String Theory: Physics or Theology?, G. L. Bradford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sue... |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sam Wormley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?, Sue... |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |