Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question

["Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul wrote:
> Edward Green wrote:
> > Paul wrote:
> > > It seems you are referring to the resistor and LED experiment.  I am
> > > working on something far more productive.  Of what use would it be to
> > > prove a LED could indeed generate photons caused by thermal noise?
> >
> > Black bodies are rumored to do this too.
>
> All atoms on Earth emit and absorb black body radiation. The LED can be
> toggled on/off.  Furthermore the red so-called photons from the LED can
> be focused on the resistor or coated to absorb its own radiation.  Yes,
> you can also focus T-rays, but such a lens is a two way street unless
> you are talking about more advanced technology other than a simple
> T-ray lens. The amount of black body radiation entering the LED remains
> the same regardless if the LED is emitting so-called photons or not.

Mm, no, if the LED emits or is about to emit, its charges are byssy or
sticked and will growan weeer emittance in that band and stint and
violare Planck's law.  Fotonic crustals do this too.  One of my edits
yester my ban from Wikipedia was that lasers could work by suppressed
transitions without a population's inversion.

-Aut