| Subject: | Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question |
|---|---|
| From: | Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:12:24 +0000 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics |
In article <g72dnSyos__IBeTYnZ2dneKdnZysnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > "Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message > news:0rfhn252l3hsp3jt10uo2rnp510f8kc0us@xxxxxxxxxx > > On 7 Dec 2006 10:33:41 -0800, "Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> This is the final moment I've > >>been waiting for. > > > > Oh good. Does this mean you'll stop posting now? > > His Aryan friends have come to take him away from this filthy planet and it > is dirty scientists. Well, his posts come from Uranus ;-) -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
| Previous by Date: | Re: does recycling make sense?, Bob Kolker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Who's kids are more likely to be neglected ?, T Wake |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |