Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question

Subject:	Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
From:	"Edward Green" <spamspamspam3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	8 Dec 2006 09:08:53 -0800
Newsgroups:	sci.physics

Paul wrote:

> It seems you are referring to the resistor and LED experiment.  I am
> working on something far more productive.  Of what use would it be to
> prove a LED could indeed generate photons caused by thermal noise?

Black bodies are rumored to do this too.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, (continued) Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Phineas T Puddleduck Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Richard Herring Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Richard Herring Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Ben Newsam Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Edward Green <= Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Autymn D. C. Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Phineas T Puddleduck Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Eric Gisse Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Phineas T Puddleduck Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Autymn D. C. Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Richard Herring

Previous by Date:	Re: Either Gisse's nuts or he's enjoying my posts., T Wake
Next by Date:	Re: Neglected kids are a _Serious_ burden on society., T Wake
Previous by Thread:	Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake
Next by Thread:	Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]