| Subject: | Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question |
|---|---|
| From: | "Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 8 Dec 2006 07:33:38 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics |
Ben Newsam wrote: > On 7 Dec 2006 10:33:41 -0800, "Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This is the final moment I've > >been waiting for. > > Oh good. Does this mean you'll stop posting now? Trust you me, I can hardly wait to leave you and your master Richard and his other cronies to your sci.physics.pub. :-) Eric Gisse wrote: > Paul wrote: > > [...] > > When are you going to stop pissing away time on USENET and actually > prove us wrong by building the device and showing us it does what you > claim it does? It seems you are referring to the resistor and LED experiment. I am working on something far more productive. Of what use would it be to prove a LED could indeed generate photons caused by thermal noise? I know for fact it happens, but so what. Perhaps those who enjoy working with the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics would be interested if I am correct, but the experiment by itself is impractical. Regards, Paul |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Paul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cancer & "Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance, hanson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, Ben Newsam |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question, T Wake |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |