| Subject: | Bell Tests and Biased Samples |
|---|---|
| From: | "Edward Green" <spamspamspam3@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 8 Dec 2006 01:25:43 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.physics |
I'm trying to understand the material at the web page of subject name: http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath420.htm Some warm up questions --- The author mentions a model where paired particles have "a definite spin (or polarization) axis". To fix our thinking, it seems to me we must fix on one or the other -- we must fix on whether we are considering a measurement returning detections along two orthogonal axes (linear polarization), or an up/down value along one axis (spin-1/2). The author fixes upon spin-1/2 particles, consistent with a graph showing "correlations" over a range 0,pi. I am having difficulty picturing an experimental set-up, however. A Stern-Gerlach apparatus, followed by a particle detector, measures "up" or "down". Doesn't this mean that detectors relatively oriented at "0" and at "pi" are the same up to a sign change in the results? And shouldn't the correlation at "0" be -1? I don't understand the operational definition of the variables measured. Can somebody spell it out for me? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Locally, microscopically, gravity is too weak to be directly obsevered., Jeff…Relf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Locally, microscopically, gravity is too weak to be directly obsevered., Eric Gisse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Cancer & "Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance, drsibia |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bell Tests and Biased Samples, Sue... |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |